Trump Explains Dumbo Care

Trump Explains Dumbo Care

    Let me get this straight . . .
    We’re going to be “gifted” with a health care
    plan we are forced to purchase and
    fined if we don’t,
    Which purportedly covers at least
    ten million more people,
    without adding a single new doctor,
    but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents,
    written by a committee whose chairman
    says he doesn’t understand it,
    passed by a Congress that didn’t read it but
    exempted themselves from it,
    and signed by a Dumbo President who smokes,
    with funding administered by a treasury chief who
    didn’t pay his taxes,
    for which we’ll be taxed for four years before any
    benefits take effect,
    by a government which has
    already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,
    all to be overseen by a surgeon general
    who is obese,
    and financed by a country that’s broke!!!!!
    ‘What the hell could possibly go wrong?’

Man Fined for Killing Grizzly Bear to Protect His Family

SideBear: Fined for what… protecting his family and property.

What red blooded man wouldn’t have done the same?

Haftin’ To Be Uproared – Occupy Atlanta

SideBear: I sure glad she cleared that up for all us.

Quote of the Day 10/25/11

The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn’t work and then they get elected and prove it. – P.J. O’Rourke

Vetting Marco Rubio by The Bear

Last week I suggested that Senator Marco Rubio would make a fine Vice Presidential choice for whoever will be running on the Republican ticket in 2012 for President. I did so because Rubio is true conservative and he has all the attributes, a very knowledge man who has wonderful presents, charisma and he can speak without a teleprompter.

The Washington Post just did a ‘hit piece’ on Rubio and there have been others, the long knives will continue on to demonize him any way that they can because they see the same thing in him as I do, the liberal establishment is scared to death of this man and his conservative beliefs.

A long time contributor and friend of this website, GD, cautioned me that Rubio may not meet the qualifications under the Constitution to hold either of the offices of President or Vice President.

But first a bit of history on Sen. Rubio:

Marco Antonio Rubio was born May 28, 1971in Miami, FL to the parents of Maria and Oriales Rubio who migrated to America from Cuba in 1956. They did not become naturalized citizens until 1975. There is no question as to whether Rubio is a citizen of the United States but it brings about the question, is Rubio a “natural born citizen”?

Article II of the Constitution clearly states that the qualifications to be President or Vice President an individual must be a “natural born Citizen”. Maybe the Founders assumed that everyone understood what they meant by “natural born citizen” because they didn’t define the meaning of the term and nowhere is it ever mentioned in the Constitution again. Whatever the reason it was is conjecture but it certainly has left future generations a dilemma about the meaning of those three words.

There is only one case in the history of the United States that directly address the issue of “natural born citizen”? “Minor v. Happersett – (1875) is Binding Precedent as to the Constitutional Definition of a Natural Born Citizen,”

The Supreme Court wrote:

    “1. The word “citizen ” is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation.

    2. In that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United states, as much so before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution as since.”
    In doing so, the US Supreme Court first had to determine if Mrs. Minor was a US citizen. The Court’s holding states that she was a US citizen because she was born in the US to parents who were citizens. (Note: the word parents was used in the plural)

Since the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the Law and all lower courts must abide by this decision whether they agree or not is immaterial, this decision sets precedents for all future courts in Law.

This can only lead one to conclude that Marco Rubio doesn’t meet the requirements necessary to hold the office of President or Vice President because his parents were not citizens at the time of his birth.

BUT there is an even bigger story here:

Obviously, if you apply the same criteria to Obama he is even less qualified to be President than Rubio. His father was a Keyan national so when the Supreme Court said in plural; parents who were citizens that immediately disqualifies him from the office he now holds.

But the real dilemma here is the Washington establishment including the courts who are very well aware of the above, who have failed the follow the Rule of Law. and they have failed in their sworn oaths to uphold the Constitution. Obviously, the Democrats are compliant with this because in their view Laws are meant to be molded to fit their circumstances but the whole issue has been ducked by the Republicans also, out of fear of reprisals and courts have done no better.

The issue becomes even more complex because everything Obama has done since he has been in office could be considered “null and void.” I doubt that is very little that could done now other than to say that the people entrusted to lead have failed us miserably.

All this could have been avoided if Obama was properly vetted before his election but of course that would have meant Washington would have had the best interest of the country first before their own.

And to the Main Stream Media, once again you have proven how worthless you are.

Natural Born Citizen for Dummies


SideBear: This from the Miami Herald who call out theWashington Post and show just how scumy the scumbags are.

Did the Washington Post embellish Marco Rubio’s ‘embellishments’?

The Washington Post just released this interesting story headlined “Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show.” The paper flagged a clear inaccuracy in his official Senate biography that states the Senator’s parents “came to America following Fidel Castro’s takeover.”

That’s false. Rubio’s parents came to the US before then, in 1956. They remained in the US after Castro took over in 1959. They returned to Cuba for brief stints early on, before the country devolved into Soviet-style totalitarianism.

But the top of the story suggests Rubio himself has given this “dramatic account:” that “he was the son of exiles, he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after ‘a thug,’ Fidel Castro, took power.” (Update note: The story struck the word “dramatic”).

However, the story doesn’t cite one speech where Rubio actually said that.

Read more here…


WorldNet Daily is reporting:

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net
Online Supreme Court opinions scrubbed in 2008 election runup

A New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court has published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of “natural-born citizen” were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents.

The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen,” a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.

That case states:

    The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

“New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at during the runup to the ’08 election,”
He initially reported several months ago on a few of the adjustments in the text of the Supreme Court opinions at the online resource, “but last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all U.S. Supreme Court cases which cite ‘Minor v. Happersett’ as they appeared on between 2006 and the present.”

Arguably, under the definition in the case, neither candidate in 2008, Democrat Obama nor Republican Sen. John McCain, would be eligible. McCain was born outside of the United States at a U.S. base in the Panama Canal Zone, and Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen.

Donofrio explained in his report that he did not know who made the changes inside the documents purporting to be U.S. Supreme Court opinions, and “the deception might have been undertaken on behalf of either one.

“Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor’s relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the ‘Full Text of Case,'” he wrote.

Read more here…