Top 10 Reasons Hillary Is Not 50 Points Ahead in Polls! By John W. Lillpop

Recently, Hillary Clinton issued a challenge that even people who like her(I am told that such people do exist) simply cannot ignore in this November’s presidential election.

“‘Why aren’t I 50 points ahead,’ you might ask.” Clinton shouted during a disquieting manic attack on the campaign trail as reported:

To be perfectly honest, that particular question has never crossed my right-wing conspiratorial mind. Rather, I have been haunted by wondering how in the hell it is that Hillary Clinton is not in federal prison, or in a holding cell for the criminally insane!

Putting aside that more pertinent question for the moment, I voluntarily took on the task of answering Clinton’s rhetorical question. In doing so, I categorized Mrs. Clinton’s voluminous and sordid history of “Deplorable” behavior into the following categories:

Treason and Capital Offenses against United States of America

High crimes and misdemeanors(Impeachable Offenses)

Corruption and misappropriation of Influence and Resources
for personal gain While Holding High Political Office

Lesser Felony Crimes

Deceit, Deliberate Lying & Perjury

Miscellaneous Character Flaws

Through meticulous culling and re-culling of hundreds of pieces of incriminating facts, I was finally able to identify the Top 10 reasons why Hillary Rodham Clinton is not 50 points(or more!) ahead of Donald Trump in the election polls.

To wit, Hillary Clinton is not the overwhelming choice of the American people to succeed Barack Obama in his diabolical plot to destroy America for the following 10 major, but hardly exclusive, reasons:

1. Deaths of four US Diplomats in Libya, Benghazi;

Cover up of Benghazi fiasco and killings to facilitate re-election of Barack Obama;

3. Willful violation of national security regulations & misuse of E-mail & Information Technology;

4. Incompetence & lack of integrity directly related to foreign policy failures(Arab Spring, etc.);

5. Perjury & Obstruction of Justice in Dealing with Congress and Government Investigators;

6. Enabling spouse in sexual exploitation of vulnerable female subordinates;

7. Obfuscation of facts concerning her serious health issues and qualifications to serve;

8. Corruption of Clinton Foundation, including providing special access and favors to Foundation donors;

9. Guilt by association—she is still betrothed to William Jefferson Clinton!;

10. Irrefutable reputation as a “Congenital Liar”

Without question, this list is but a fraction of the logical, sound reasons why Hillary Clinton should not be allowed on the White Grounds, much less in the Oval Office!

God willing, these facts will help Americans in search of the truth avoid the trap of voting for the dishonorable, deplorable, disgusting Hillary Clinton!

We must do this to survive as a great nation!

Related

At the Pearly Gates

Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Al Gore were in an airplane that crashed.
In heaven, they found God sitting on the great, white throne. He addressed
Al first.

“Al, what do you believe in?” Al replied, “Well, I believe I won the
election in 2000, but it was your will that I did not serve. I’ve come to
understand that now.” God thought for a second and said, “Very good. Come
and sit at my left.”

God then addressed Bill. “Bill, what do you believe in?” Bill replied, “I
believe in forgiveness. I’ve sinned, but I’ve never held a grudge against my
fellow man, and I hope no grudges are held against me.” Again, God thought
for a second and then said, “You are forgiven, my son. Come and sit at my
right.”

God then turned to Hillary and asked, “Hillary, what do you believe in?”

She replied, “I believe you’re sitting in my chair.”

Krauthammer’s Take: Trump’s ‘Birther’ Statement Shows ‘He Wants to Get This Behind Him’

Quote of the Day 09/27/16

If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for entering and remaining in the country illegally — you might live in a nation that was founded by geniuses but is run by idiots.- Jeff Foxworthy

Stain that Would be on Obama’s Conscience — if He Had one By Selwyn Duke

While speaking at the United Nations Tuesday and advocating more Muslim migration into the West, Barack Obama likened a refusal to accept the Muslims to the “turning away [of] Jews fleeing Nazi Germany,” which he called “a stain on our collective conscience.” But while Obama sought to lecture us, he actually condemned himself.

Of course, there is no equivalence between the WWII-era Jews and the Muslim migrants, as no one had to worry about terrorists being embedded among the former. In contrast, we know for a fact that terrorists are among the Muslim migrants. Without comprehensive Western-style databases in Syria (which is supposedly the focus) and with bribery getting you official government documents saying you’re whoever you want to be in that nation, there simply is no way to vet these people.

But that Obama would attempt a flawed analogy isn’t his real shame here. It’s that the real analogy isn’t between the WWII Jews and today’s Muslim migrants.
It’s between the WWII Jews and another persecuted minority: the Middle East Christians.
You know, the people who multiple sources say face genocide as Christianity is gradually wiped out in the Mideast.

They’re also the people Obama won’t lift a finger to help.

In fact, while Christians are 10 percent of Syria’s population and are being targeted by Islamic State, only one half of one percent of Obama’s Syrian migrants have been Christian.
That translates into 56 out of 10,801 “refugees.”
It’s so astounding that even liberal Newsweek ran an article titled “The U.S. Bars Christian, Not Muslim, Refugees From Syria.” Really compassionate guy that Obama, huh? Have any more lectures for us, Barry?

Since it’s clear Obama couldn’t care less who lives or dies in the Middle East, the question is raised: whatis his real agenda?

Try this on for size: the vast majority of U.S. Muslims now vote Democrat, with Obama
having gotten 89 and 85 percent of their votes in, respectively, 2008 and 2012. In contrast, believing Christians are known to support conservatives. And it isn’t as if Obama doesn’t know this. He said last year that immigration was making America “more and more of a hodgepodge of folks” who he was “hopeful” would drown out conservatism (hey, didn’t you always want to live in a hodgepodge?).

Of course, this only works if you have the right hodgepodge. And with 70 to 90 percent of today’s immigrants voting Democrat upon being naturalized, liberals love the mix. Just keep the Christians out.

This is what Obama and his ilk mean when saying “Our strength lies in our diversity”:
“Our [Democrat political] strength lies in our [orchestrated] diversity.” They’re just not as blunt as was Andrew Neather, ex-advisor to former British prime minister Tony Blair, when he
admitted that the massive Third World immigration into the U.K. was designed “to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.

” Hey, it doesn’t matter if it destroys Western culture. Why serve in Heaven when you can
reign in Hell? The reality, again, is that Obama cares as much about Mideastern lives as he does about Hillary’s emails.

Immigration, “refugee” acceptance, family reunification, etc. are all about one thing and one thing only:importing voters. If most new immigrants would support Republicans, we’d have about as much immigration as North Korea. And the border?

There’d be an impenetrable wall, sunk down 100 feet into the earth, with an electrified fence on top of it and organ-disrupting, pain-inducing sound wave weapons
mounted on turrets every thousand feet of its length.
Oh, and drones with heat and motion sensors would be buzzing about monitoring it 24/7/365.
Obama would have many stains on his conscience, if he actually had a conscience. But possession of such generally eludes twisted, evil, vile men.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com

Washing Hillary’s Mouth by David L. Hunter

“I maintain that ‘political correctness’ has as much to do with what is correct — i.e. true — as ‘ethnic cleansing’ has to do with personal hygiene.” – Clifford May

Mr. May brilliantly exposes “political correctness” as what it is: anti-American, anti-First Amendment word burning. This is the Democrats’ go-to political strategy to control—or severely limit—the social discourse. Hillary Clinton polarizes via hate speech: demonizing the proponents of traditional American values.

Mrs. Clinton was wrong to proclaim half of Trump supporters a “basket of deplorables”: racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic or Islamaphobic. This basket case needs a mirror. What of the election of a two-term black president? What of commonplace interracial, and newly legalized gay marriage? She’s the one who needs “redemption,” not us.

Unlike the human rights violating foreign governments the Clinton Foundation readily accepts money from, America is one of the most tolerant societies on earth.

Our problems are physical safety, and the economic: debt, joblessness, porous borders, government overreach and terrorism. Progressives focus on these non-existent “weather” problems to distract from their failed policies. And specifically in Hillary’s case, her failed record, law breaking and corruption.

David L. Hunter is an Associate Editor at “Capitol Hill Outsider.” He’s on Twitter and blogs at davidlhunter.blogspot.com. He is published in The Washington Post, The Washington Times, “FrontPage Mag,” and extensively in “Patriot Post,” “Canada Free Press” and “American Thinker.”