Who needs Oprah anyways?
The Bear on Sep 10 2008 at 8:30 am | Filed under: Election 08’, Politics
Sorry ladies, but I think her show is a gross waste of time. Oprah with her billions is just another bleeding heart liberal who plays on the emotions of her audience.
So the Queen of day time TV doesn’t want to have Sarah Palin on because as she states, “When I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates.”
Pardon my candor… who the hell has she been promoting for President for the last year. Who made her eyelashes fall off with tears of joy at the Democratic convention?
Certainly it is her show and she can have on or reject any guest she chooses but if you want the real reason Sarah is not being invited… Oprah is scared to death that Sarah with be a big hit and if you are an Obama worshiper, this is a no, no.
Sarah Says…
Related
And as long I am in a trashing mode…Bill O’Reilly is beginning to irk me too.
Mr. “No Spin” only two weeks ago stated on his radio show that he gets upset when conservatives refer to Obama’s middle name “Hussein” or refer to him as “Barry”.
Sounds like O’Reilly is drinking Obama “Kool-Aid” to me or to put it another way… there is some major suck-up going on here to get an exclusive interview.
Obama’s legal name when he lived in Indonesia was Barry Soetoro and Obama’s legal name now Barack “HUSSEIN” Obama or should we excuse these facts and simply call him The Chosen One.
This from an article Bill O’Reilly wrote last week on Townhall.com…
-
As far as philosophy goes, Obama is convinced that the federal government should be in control of income distribution and, to some extent, should regulate the free marketplace. That is a classic liberal position and he promotes it well.
More spin from Mr. No Spin – This is way beyond classic liberalism it is classic Marxist/Socialism.
Will Mr. Spin ask Obama to produce his birth certificate and medical records? I am waiting to see.
And Jim Mc adds this about Big Bad Bill O’Reilly.
-
How about pathetic, fawning poltroon O’Reilly? Didn’t see his interview, but this looks like the “morning-after bouquet”, just in case he hurt sweet Barry’s feelings.
Bill actually thinks that the snake-pit of the elite Left will respect him when he writes such bilge. He apparently never heard the term, “useful idiot”.
How about the closing wish: “God help him.”? Make that, “God help us!”, if this calculating Marxist ever gets elected, thanks at least in some part to people like O’Reilly.
And don’t get me started on that slug, Alan Colmes.
Related
Obama and Fox News: ‘Tentative Truce?’
As Fox News prepares to interview Barack Obama tomorrow night, during prime time, TV journalist Michael Wolff details a meeting between Barack Obama, Fox News president Roger Ailes, and News Corporation president Rupert Murdoch in which the Fox execs promised to lay off the Democratic presidential candidate.
According to Wolff’s telling, this was more than a mere tete-à-tete, this was a full-on diplomatic meeting (initiated at Murdoch’s request), conducted only after preparation and with preconditions from the Obama campaign.
The apparent purpose? To smooth things over in the event that Obama defeats John McCain:
-
Early in the summer that Obama relented and a secret courtesy meeting was arranged. The meeting began with Murdoch sitting down, knee to knee with Obama, at the Waldorf-Astoria. The younger man was deferential—and interested in his story [...]
Then, after he said his piece, Murdoch switched places and let his special guest, Roger Ailes, sit knee to knee with Obama.
Obama lit into Ailes. He said that he didn’t want to waste his time talking to Ailes if Fox was just going to continue to abuse him and his wife, that Fox had relentlessly portrayed him as suspicious, foreign, fearsome—just short of a terrorist.
Ailes, unruffled, said it might not have been this way if Obama had more willingly come on the air instead of so often giving Fox the back of his hand.
A tentative truce, which may or may not have vast historical significance, was at that moment agreed upon.
“A tentative truce?” A truce “which may or may not have vast historical significance?” What, exactly, does that mean? One hopes it doesn’t mean that Fox News is going to start covering Obama the way their competitors, especially MSNBC, cover Obama.
[…]
Read more from Newsbusters
2 Responses to “Who needs Oprah anyways?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Barrack Obama proudly claimed that it was Rev. Wright that brought him to Christ some 20 years ago. The question of what he was for the first 20 some years prior begs asking. I remain amazed that no repeat no journalist has ever asked or posed this question!!!
Well great. What does this say about news outlets if they’re making deals like this with Barry and his people. Is this to make sure that the Fairness Doctrine doesn’t hurt those sources where msm claims conservative bias is predominant?
Now about that Barack Hussein Obama interview done by O’Reilly. I kept noticing when the camera backed up that BHO would reach his hand out below the lower camera site line to O’Reilly’s knee or leg. I don’t know what to make of this but it did strike me as interesting? or maybe disturbing? or something that was significant. I can’t quite put my finger on it yet. Did anyone else notice this gesture??