McCain’s Good Stewards of Bad Policy

Just about the time I reconcile myself that I have to vote for John McCain in lieu of Lenin or Marx he shows his true Democratic Lite colors. We all know that McCain is a stubborn pig headed man with a short fuse who is liable to say anything at a moments notice but a foreign policy speech is a scripted event designed to woo voters.

His foreign policy speech of last week may gain him favor with some Democrats and Independent voters but I wonder how many Conservatives he lost?

Here is an excerpt from last week John McCain’s foreign policy speech…

    There is such a thing as international good citizenship. We need to be good stewards of our planet and join with other nations to help preserve our common home. The risks of global warming have no borders. We and the other nations of the world must get serious about substantially reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years or we will hand off a much-diminished world to our grandchildren. We need a successor to the Kyoto Treaty, a cap-and-trade system that delivers the necessary environmental impact in an economically responsible manner. We Americans must lead by example and encourage the participation of the rest of the world, including most importantly, the developing economic powerhouses of China and India.

The entire text of John McCain’s foreign policy speech can be read here …

For those of you educated in government schools cap-and-trade system is a polite way of masking the intent of Global Warming Tax for carbon dioxide emissions on every citizen of the United States including the air you breathe. (Carbon Dioxide is the very air you exhale)

While he did not define what he meant when he said “successor to the Kyoto Treaty” but by using Kyoto as a starting point he shows his ignorance (by his own admission) about economic issues. Kyoto is designed and aimed directly at America’s economy with the intent to turn the U.S. into a third world nation while excluding developing third world economies like China and India who by far emit more pollution than the United Sates.

What McCain has done here is he has reconfirmed his previous position and that he has bought into the hoax of Global Warming that it is man-made. Evidently McCain hasn’t read any or chosen to ignore the mountain of evidence that has come forth dismissing Global Warming as being man-made.

The sad reality of McCain’s position on this issue it mirrors what Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama positions are.

Here is another excerpt…

    America must be a model citizen if we want others to look to us as a model. How we behave at home affects how we are perceived abroad. We must fight the terrorists and at the same time defend the rights that are the foundation of our society. We can’t torture or treat inhumanely suspected terrorists we have captured. I believe we should close Guantanamo and work with our allies to forge a new international understanding on the disposition of dangerous detainees under our control.

The insinuation here by McCain to the world is that the United States has tortured detainees, if so, by whom and when? If McCain has such evidence then he should turn it in to the Justice Department for prosecutions and if not, stop fueling the anti-American agenda.

What this is Guilt by Innuendo.

And another excerpt…

    McCain said the United States’ goal in fighting Islamic extremists should be “to win the hearts and minds of the vast majority of moderate Muslims who do not want their future controlled by a minority of violent extremists.

    “In this struggle, scholarships will be far more important than smart bombs.”

Really? Even as a theoretical proposition, trusting the average American college education (even if one does not draw Sami el-Arian or Ward Churchill as one’s mentor) to woo young Muslims to the virtues of the Great Satan would be something of a long shot. But it isn’t even theoretical anymore.

There’s plenty of evidence out there that the most extreme “extremists” are those who’ve been most exposed to the west – and western education: from Osama bin Laden (summer school at Oxford, punting on the Thames) and Mohammed Atta (Hamburg University urban planning student) to the London School of Economics graduate responsible for the beheading of Daniel Pearl. The idea that handing out college scholarships to young Saudi males and getting them hooked on Starbucks and car-chase movies will make this stuff go away is ridiculous – and unworthy of a serious presidential candidate. – The Corner Blog

Besides that, what we don’t need is 10,000 more Saudis enrolling in flight schools learning how to fly airliners into tall buildings.

And then there is this about McCain’s promise to “secure the borders first.”

    Rep. Heath Shuler, D-NC, sponsor of the bipartisan immigration-enforcement bill known as the Save Act (H.R.4088), said this week that Sen. McCain was calling Republican House members in an attempt to block discharge petition that would force a vote on the bill on the House floor.

McCain’s staff denies Sculer’s allegation but given Mr. McAmnesty past track record on illegal immigration any denial on his part is questionable.

My Final Word – John McCain claims he is a ‘conservative’ but his past track record and actions say otherwise and “Words Don’t Mean Anything” (Hear that Barack) in a campaign season that is based upon pandering for votes.

The reality of the two party system in America today is we have Democratic Lite presented by the Republican Party that has forsaken the high road and principles of Ronald Reagan’s conservative model for winning elections at any cost and…

The former Democratic Party who is giving us the latest version of Karl Marx’s socialism that even Marx would question how far left they have moved as both Hillary and Obama have pledged to spend close to a trillion dollars on new social programs.

cpusa.jpg

This is at a time when we (Uncle Sam) can not meet the present financial obligations of Social Security and Medicare. (See next article) I serious doubt that either of these two understand the economic reality of their trillion dollar vote buying schemes.

Either way this presents a dilemma for Right Thinking People in choosing the next commander-in-chief as our choice is between Larry, Curly and Moe.

you-decide.jpg

Technorati Tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,    
Social Networking:
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

2 Responses to “McCain’s Good Stewards of Bad Policy”

  1. on 07 Apr 2008 at 1:15 pm Terry L.

    There is only one reason to vote for McCain and that is for the sake of the troops. However, if one votes for Obama and he is elected, then hopefully the troops (read national defense/security) will remain protected by an outraged public, a congress running scared and a few administration appointed professionals with cooler heads prevailing. It is a gamble!

    McCain certainly will compromise on most, if not all, social and economic issues in an effort to prove that he can reach across the aisle and be friends. They won’t be his friends. They will stab him in the back and treat him no differently than they have the Bushes, if not moreso! The socialists will be on a destructive rampage of historic proportion and will employ undignified gutter tactics of the lowest form. Being both bottom feeders and sharks the democrats/socialists will wound McCain quickly and deeply and then whip up a bloody feeding frenzy of very long duration. It is an international socialist model. One only has to look at what the French press is trying to do to President Sarkozy right now. The very tactics they U.S. socialist press did to George W. Identical!

    With Obama I believe his one term will be akin to the disastrous, mostly forgotten, Carter administration. Even the socialists will have to gag when looking at the Obama administrations incompetence. The good news is that the unpleasant Carter joke gave Republicans long term conservative momentum. Sadly, that hard won momentum has been wastefully frittered away over the past few years. The question begs an answer “can another socialist incompetent give renaissance to a long term conservative movement”? Once again, it is a gamble!

  2. on 08 Apr 2008 at 8:23 am Terry L.

    There is only one reason to vote for McCain and that is for the sake of the troops. However, if one votes for Obama and he is elected, then hopefully the troops (read national defense/security) will remain protected by an outraged public, a congress running scared and a few administration appointed professionals with cooler heads prevailing. It is a gamble!

    McCain certainly will compromise on most, if not all, social and economic issues in an effort to prove that he can reach across the aisle and be friends. They won’t be his friends. They will stab him in the back and treat him no differently than they have the Bushes, if not more so! The socialists will be on a destructive rampage of historic proportion and will employ undignified gutter tactics of the lowest form. Being both bottom feeders and sharks the democrats/socialists will wound McCain quickly and deeply and then whip up a bloody feeding frenzy of very long duration. It is an international socialist model. One only has to look at what the French press is trying to do to President Sarkozy right now. The very tactics the U.S. socialist press have employed from the “git go” against George W. Identical!

    With Obama I believe his one term will be akin to the disastrous, mostly forgotten, Carter administration. Even the socialists will have to gag when looking at the Obama administrations incompetence. The good news is that the unpleasant Carter joke gave Republicans long term conservative momentum. Sadly, that hard won momentum has been wastefully frittered away over the past few years. The question begs an answer “can another socialist incompetent give renaissance to a long term conservative movement”? Once again, it is a gamble!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.