Coburn gets best of Reid on ‘omnibus’ package

Sen. Tom Coburn is used to being a lonely “no” vote on overwhelming Senate votes, but on Monday afternoon, his GOP colleagues came to his defense.

Coburn (R-Okla.) prevailed in blocking a massive package of generally non-controversial bills that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid brought to the floor, angering Democrats and some Republicans while raising Coburn’s status as a cult hero to fiscal conservatives. The vote was 52-40 on a procedural motion that required 60 votes.

The package of about three dozen bills includes research money for paralysis victims, a civil rights bill named after Emmitt Till and a crackdown on child pornography. Yet the package also has dozens of other measures that would authorize billions in programs for the environment, foreign relations and health care.

Coburn is notorious in the Senate for blocking all manner of routine bills that he says include wasteful spending, and has earned the nickname “Dr. No” for his holds on Senate bills.

Republicans stuck together in blocking this bill not because they oppose all of the programs, but because they have decided to block everything small and large this week until they get votes on stalled energy legislation.

The vote sent Reid into one of his trademark tirades on the Senate floor…

Read more from The Politico

Social Networking:
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

2 Responses to “Coburn gets best of Reid on ‘omnibus’ package”

  1. on 30 Jul 2008 at 12:53 pm dadinseattle

    This is exactly the right thing to do. Democrats better ‘wake up’ as the American people
    want action not rhetoric. We want domestic supply increased and dependency ended.

  2. on 01 Aug 2008 at 12:49 pm amyphilo

    http://www.uniteforlife.org/harryreid.pdf

    Mothers Tell Harry Reid to Read Up On FDA Antidepressant
    Warnings
    by Amy Philo, amy@uniteforlife.org, 214-705-0169, 817-793-8028

    The Food and Drug Administration has issued 25 warnings concerning the use of
    antidepressants ranging from the increased risk of suicide to the danger of
    premature births, birth defects, and giving birth to babies with respiratory
    problems. Existing studies show a doubled rate of suicide, spontaneous abortion,
    and stillbirth, a five times higher rate of preterm birth, six times higher rate of
    persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), and similar increases in heart
    defects and other life-threatening complications. Based on MedWatch data, over
    the past four years an estimated 2,900 babies died via spontaneous abortion
    caused by SSRI exposure during pregnancy, 4,360 were born with birth defects,
    3,000 were born prematurely, and 4,160 developed heart disease. MedWatch
    reports also include sudden infant death as a consequence of antidepressant
    exposure via breast milk alone.

    On July 28, the U.S. Senate convened for a showdown on the so-called “Coburn
    Omnibus,” considering Majority Leader Harry Reid’s motion to invoke cloture on
    the 398-page bill. The vote would set a precedent demonstrating the relative
    importance of the Constitution over special interest groups’ priorities. Senator
    Reid (D-NV) urged Republicans to vote against deliberating on the package,
    which contains 35 bills and at least $10 billion in potential taxpayer expenditures.

    Reid had sought to hotline the majority of the bills in the package and therefore
    pass them with no debate or formal vote, which Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)
    objected to. As reported by the New York Times, Reid stated, “Not a single one
    of the 35 bills in this package are partisan or controversial,” He went on to remark
    that anyone voting “no” would have to explain to his or her constituents. “These
    bills have been passed by the House of Representatives and their respective
    Senate committees with overwhelming support from Democrats and
    Republicans.”

    Section D of the omnibus bill is The Melanie Blocker Stokes MOTHERS Act,
    which has never even been discussed in a Senate committee, much less
    approved by the majority of Senator Kennedy’s HELP committee, where it has
    stalled since February.

    There has been ongoing public outcry regarding new efforts by drug makers to
    expand their market for antidepressants and other top-selling psychotropic
    medications by pushing to enact laws requiring screening for mental illness on all
    sectors of the population from newborns to school children, on up to the military
    and elderly. But this outrage has been especially vigorous with regard to the hotly
    contested Melanie Blocker Stokes MOTHERS Act, which would increase the
    number of pregnant and new mothers taking these drugs.

    Critics of the bill fear what repercussions there would be for everyday Americans
    if the bill were ever to pass, and many expressed vehement objections to Reid’s
    statement that not one of the bills was controversial. Perhaps Senator Reid can
    explain to the American people why he supported a bill that would increase
    cases of spontaneous abortions and fatal birth defects while causing more
    mothers to kill themselves or their children.

    Neglecting to mention The MOTHERS Act during his speeches Monday, Reid
    emphasized the need to pass some of the most sympathetic-sounding bills in the
    package, such as paralysis and pornography legislation. Yet in a comment given
    to the Washington Post, Reid accused the Senators who had shot down the
    cloture motion of voting against mothers suffering from postpartum depression.
    Reid’s seemingly intentional failure to bring up The MOTHERS Act during the
    debate and his false statements that the bills in the package are all non-
    controversial and that they have all passed the appropriate Senate committees
    should arouse much suspicion.

    On the floor, MOTHERS Act cosponsor Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) alluded to the
    bill but incorrectly described its background, stating that Melanie Stokes had
    killed herself just a few days after giving birth. Durbin also said, “This bill really
    tries to help women with postpartum depression.” In fact, Melanie Stokes took
    her life 3 ˝ months after her daughter Sommer was born, but only after she was
    given four successive cocktails of antidepressant, anti-anxiety, and antipsychotic
    drugs as well as electroshock.

    Melanie Stokes is not alone. The FDA issued the first-ever black box warning for
    suicide on antidepressant drugs in September, 2004. The warning stated that
    antidepressants double the risk of suicide according to clinical trial data. Since
    2002 there has been a 6,300% increase on antidepressant warnings from drug
    agencies around the globe. Mathy Milling Downing, whose 12-year-old daughter
    Candace hanged herself from the valance of her bed in 2004 after being placed
    on Zoloft for test anxiety, told the FDA at their hearing immediately preceding the
    issuance of the suicide warning, “The blood of our children is on your hands.”

    Downing objected to Reid’s recent tactics, stating, “It’s deplorable that Congress
    continues to support the drug companies over constituents. In no way should
    Congress be involved in medical decisions. That should be between the doctor
    and the patient.”

    Numerous media stories have surfaced about objections to The MOTHERS Act
    and controversy surrounding it. The bill’s lead sponsor Senator Robert
    Menendez (D-NJ), who accepted more than $300,000 from pharmaceutical
    donors during the last election cycle, even went so far as to tell a reporter from
    the New Jersey Record that he considers the opposition “wrong-minded.”

    At least for now, the “Coburn Omnibus” seems less of a threat, since Dr.
    Coburn’s hold could not be overcome by Senate Democrats. They fell eight votes
    short of the required 60 to break the filibuster. But victims and survivors are left
    wondering if Senators Reid, Durbin, and Menendez intentionally disregard
    matters of life and death for everyday Americans who are vulnerable and
    uninformed about the FDA-documented risks of antidepressants, or whether
    these Congressmen are simply ignorant and out of touch.

    Julie Edgington’s son Manie turned blue at birth and had to be transported by
    helicopter to a hospital with facilities equipped to give him life-sustaining
    treatments. One procedure involved ripping a hole in his heart with a catheter
    and balloon inserted through an artery in his leg. Manie almost had to have his
    leg amputated, but on day eight doctors detected a pulse in his foot just before
    starting a twelve-hour open heart surgery to correct a condition called
    Transposition of the Great Arteries, in which the aorta and pulmonary arteries in
    the heart are switched. Manie scraped through with his life, his leg, and lasting
    physical and emotional scars.

    According to FDA MedWatch data from the past four years, Paxil use during
    pregnancy was reported as the primary suspect cause of approximately two
    thirds of all drug-precipitated cases of Transposition of the Great Arteries. It
    wasn’t until Manie was about two years old that Julie finally discovered the Paxil-
    TGA link. She now has a lawsuit against drug maker GlaxoSmithKline.

    Edgington said, “I want Senator Reid to think about how he would feel if he were
    in my place or Manie’s place. Manie will have to suffer for the rest of his life. I
    think if you were to ask Manie how he felt about this legislation, if he were old
    enough, he would consider this far worse than simply controversial.” Julie doesn’t
    understand why Congress would want to do anything to the people that could
    result in more birth defects and death. “The guilt and the heartache I feel is
    unbelievable. Sitting there looking at your baby and wondering if he is going to
    live or die, I don’t think a person can feel any worse. The way I felt when I was
    popping Paxil while I was pregnant was nothing compared to this. Nobody should
    ever take these pills, not even as a last resort.”

    Kim Witczak, founder of WoodyMatters.com found Reid’s attempt to slip the
    MOTHERS Act through without hearings, discussion, or debate “insulting.” Kim
    has made more than 30 trips to Washington, D.C. in an effort to educate
    Congress and reform policy on drug safety. Her late husband Woody hanged
    himself after taking Zoloft for insomnia for a total of five weeks.

    Witczak said she wonders why the same Congress that appeared concerned
    about drug safety during last year’s hearings on the PDUFA legislation would
    attempt to pass a bill like The MOTHERS act without any consideration for the
    effects it could have on the public. “This bill would really set new mothers up for
    depression by convincing them it’s likely to happen. As a woman, if someone
    offered me this sort of screening, I would say ‘No way,’ and ‘No thank you.’ I feel
    very strongly that with the potential effect of death, this sort of legislation
    deserves serious investigation.”

    Kim Crespi, whose husband David killed their twin daughters in 2006 after taking
    Prozac for seven days, called the actions of the cosponsors who tried to bypass
    normal procedure irresponsible. Kim said she feels Prozac caused David’s
    psychotic break, and she doesn’t think that our current mental health system
    takes the adverse effects of the available medications into account at all.
    “Without acknowledging these effects, we are treating people beyond their level
    of control and then holding them completely responsible when all hell breaks
    loose. Congress needs to carefully pursue and consider the truth before even
    thinking of passing The MOTHERS Act.”

    Caroline Gammell, who had suicidal thoughts after three days on Celexa,
    contacted various government agencies and officials including members and
    committees in Congress after her drug reaction in 1999, but has never received
    any response. She said she is worried about anything that could enable
    someone to pump her full of drugs that could be deadly, adding that since she
    hasn’t yet had children, she considers the proposed legislation especially scary.

    Drug-sponsored groups have worked hard for the past several sessions of
    Congress trying to pass The Melanie Blocker Stokes MOTHERS Act via
    deceptive P.R. and pharmaceutical contributions to members of Congress, and
    are likely to continue their efforts indefinitely. With the demonstrated lack of
    concern from so many doctors over the recent revelation that antidepressant
    effectiveness is no greater than that of a placebo, patients are left all too often
    ignorant and accepting of medical advice to use these drugs. When politics and
    profits take precedence over human life, and drugs that can kill are pushed on
    patients like candy, it becomes the responsibility of the public to protect
    themselves.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.