<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America, Not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on By Dennis Prager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/america-not-keith-ellison-decides-what-book-a-congressman-takes-his-oath-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/america-not-keith-ellison-decides-what-book-a-congressman-takes-his-oath-on/</link>
	<description>&#34;The Absurd Report...chasing liberals like villagers after Frankenstein&#34;   ~Doug Giles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gingrich and Prager are Right: Freedom and Democracy are Scary - Unsought Input</title>
		<link>http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/america-not-keith-ellison-decides-what-book-a-congressman-takes-his-oath-on/comment-page-1/#comment-31686</link>
		<dc:creator>Gingrich and Prager are Right: Freedom and Democracy are Scary - Unsought Input</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/america-not-keith-ellison-decides-what-book-a-congressman-takes-his-oath-on/#comment-31686</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liberal bloggers are predictably up in arms.  Many writers have commented on the somewhat strained appeals to the threat of terrorism, saying that Gingrich and Prager are using scare tactics instead of rational arguments.  Plenty of posts point out the irony of speaking out against free speech at a First Amendment award ceremony, and many have pointed out the logic of Ellison swearing on the holy book he actually believes in.  Some conservative see things differently. But I won&#8217;t comment either way along those lines, because at the heart of their arguments, both Prager and Gingrich are right.  I agree with them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
